No film music composer has used Carnatic and Hindustani Ragas as extensively and beautifully as ILaiyaraaja.
I have tried to explain the classical elements and the nuances in his music in this Blog.
I am a person with varied interests.
Music is my breath and though I like all kinds of music, I am enamoured of the variety and the depth of Indian Classical music.As far as Film music is concerned, I love Old songs and ILaiyaraaja-whom I consider as one of the best composers in the world- is my favourite composer.
I love travelling and meeting new people . A lover of nature, I prefer those long walks.
I said ‘people’ because at
times categorising becomes tough. For example, what would you call a person who
is creative and aesthetic and poetic? A poet?
If yes, what about a person
who is creative, aesthetic and musical? A musician?
What about a person who is
creative, aesthetic and artistic? An artist?
Does it mean that a poet is
not musical and artistic, that a musician is not poetic, that an artist is not
musical and poetic?
That is why, I detest
labelling and frown at people the moment they start labelling things or people.
So, rather than answering – or
trying to answer – the question asked in the beginning, let me take up some
examples. Rest assured, it will be done by the end of this post.
I am a poet and I
am beyond Time
I give life to
things
I create, I give
and I destroy- Like Him
I do not give in
to adulation; nor do I give in to insults
‘Change’ is my
philosophy
Take it if you
agree; Bark if you don’t – It does not affect me
These are part of a poem
written by KaNNadasan and though there is no reference to what keeps him
going, the words are powerful enough for us to understand and interpret the
meaning.
People like him who cannot be
‘boxed’ or ‘labelled’ keep going because of their clarity on what their purpose
in life is.
Needless to say, ILaiyaraaja
is also part of such ‘people’.
What we are going to see today
is a song whose first line says – This is the melody directly from the heart
and it will not stop even if anybody tries their best to stop it.
A song which would not have
been heard by many outside the states that speak Telugu-Oka Hrudayamu palukina sa ri ga ma
swaramu idhi from Kunti Putrudu (1993) - shimmers in Gowri
Manohari in the voice of Yesudas.
Traversing the different octaves
in a single sweep, the akaaram in the beginning shows the sketch of the raga
in a matter of seconds. The Pallavi adds more shades to the sketch with
two different sets of strings. Majestic and alluring! The sound of the bells
between the lines makes it subtly colourful.
With its unique soft and
resonant tonality, the sitar gives a diffused glow in the beginning of
the first interlude. Amidst that light, the flute appears, moves
around, floats in the air and fills the atmosphere with Gowri Manohari
sporting a bewitching smile.
The pleasing demeanour
continues in the CharaNams, dancing and prancing, with the second half
of the first CharaNam seeing a flurry of swaras. The graceful
response of the flute is subtle and nuanced with the Raga Laya Natana
Raaja holding sway over Gowri Manohari and Chatushram.
..And he continues this in the
second interlude. First, the sitar and the percussion play
ta ki ta/ ta ki ta/ ta ki ta/ta ka dhi mi.
The flute responds in
kind. The sitar plays again along with the percussion and this
time, it is the strings that respond.
The sitar then plays – ta
ki ta/ta ki ta/ ta ka- and the strings reflect it in its inimitable
style. The pattern repeats. The sitar, flute and the strings
join hands together, put their feet together and sing and dance together - with
glee.
The flurry of swaras
continues in the second half of the second Charanam, the pattern and the
combination being different from that of the first one.
Does it answer the question
asked in the beginning?
What drives some
people?
Can I say it is the drive that
drives some people?
Being compassionate is one of
the virtues of poets and artistes. Only if one is compassionate can he/she
understand real emotions and feelings. Concomitantly, this gets reflected in
their works. A genuine poet/artiste imagines himself/herself to be the character/thing.
In other words, they get into the skin of the character and the output is for
all of us to see.
This poet, who loved Krishna
from the bottom of his heart imagines himself to be His mother and sings a
lullaby. Now, see what happens.
Lakshmi- the One
who is seated on the lotus flower- has sent you a garland of Tulasi and a
bouquet of flowers from the Karpaga tree. Oh my dear Emperor, please do not
cry! Wear these and sleep peacefully.
The poetic beauty in this
verse composed by VishNu cittar-better known as Periyaazhwar-
cannot be missed; nor can the compassion and care. If the Tulasi and Karpaga
Vriksha (considered to be a tree which can grant the boon one wishes for)
are aesthetically beautiful, the line that says ‘Lakshmi has sent it’,
is imagination at its best. After all, as per legend isn’t Lakshmi, Vishnu’s
consort? Wife sending flowers to her husband who is in the form of a child, is
unthinkable and yet shows the power of ‘decorative imagination’. But beyond all
this is that ‘assuming the role of His mother’. Stroke of a Genius!
In the song of the day, the
female character assumes the role of a mother. But what stands out is the way
the it has been composed making one say that the composer has assumed the role
of a mother. Yes, the wordings of the song are pregnant with meanings and
feelings, but it is the tune and the orchestration that make it complete; that
provide the soul.
For starters, Naan
Undhan Thaayaaga VeNdum (Ullasa ParavaigaL), is based purely on
that classical raga called Mohanam. As I have often been saying,
a raga is just a tool and it is in the hands of the composer to make it
beautiful. This composer is known to embellish any raga with his
creativity making one see different shades and colours. In this song too, Mohanam
shimmers with beauty even as it is heard from different instruments- some known
and some unknown.
But there is also another
aspect which is special like most of his compositions and we shall see this
first.
The composition is set in the 6-beat
cycle Rupakam(some may say it is in Tisram, but I feel Rupakam
is more appropriate, though both are related, in terms of the count). The prelude
goes without a percussion, but it absolutely fits in Rupakam. After a
sustained sound for two cycles, one hears the bell sound for the next
eight cycles. A very different instrument sounding like the violin takes
over and goes on for the next six cycles until yet another differently sounding
instrument – like the sympathetic strings one finds in stringed
instruments- sounds for two cycles taking us to the Pallavi.
Starting without a percussion
first with the rhythm guitar joining soon and sounding ta ka dhi
mi/ta ka dhi mi/ta ka dhi mi constantly, the Pallavi sounds like a
riddle-especially the second half- to many. But the fact is – Aanadhellam/
Aagattume/Aaruthale/Serattume/Aanandame/Vaaaaa- follows the 6-beat
cycle with 3 rupakams (or 6 tisrams).
Let us now get on with the
melodic part.
If the sustained sound in the
beginning is sober, the sound of the bell is alluring. It quietly plays
the notes of Mohanam and ends with the descending notes. The special
instrument – sounding like the violin – is genuinely special as it
oozes compassion. The sympathetic instrument that follows seems to say, ‘Forget
your worries, I am there as your mother’.
Starting with gaandharam
(ga), the Pallavi in the voice of Janaki gives a sketch of Mohanam
in no time, at the same time giving that ‘motherly’ feel.
With finesse, the keys
start sketching Mohanam in the first interlude and the strings
reply with flourish. The flute now continues the sketch in its
inimitable style. It is then left to that special instrument we saw in
the prelude to complete the sketch with rounded mellowness. Not
satisfied yet, the flute and the strings give some splendorous
touches to the sketch.
The five swaras of Mohanam
take a meandering stroll in the CharaNams. The appearance of the
upper ‘Sa’ in the penultimate line, gives the impetus while the podi
sangatis in the last line, warm the cockles of one’s heart.
The special instrument
does it again in the second interlude. It is intense and at the same
time abloom with brilliant colours. The flute sounds now and then and it
seems like a mother-son interaction. With unobtrusive energy, the strings
move in higher-octave after this and the conversations between different
instruments suggest something.
Who? What figure? Was it so
scary and horrific to look at?
Before I attempt to answer
these questions, I want to ask a series of questions:
What happens to us when we are
in awe of something? What happens to us when we are filled with joy? What
happens to us when we are ecstatic?
The answer is simple – We
forget totally forget ourselves and utter something which others might consider
offensive.
This is what happened to that
gentleman. Yet, there is a difference between ordinary (us) and extraordinary
(geniuses). While we would just stop with meaningless sounds or words (at times
even expletives), the latter give an aesthetic form to it.
Here, the name of the genius
is ThiruppaaNaazhwar. He looks at the magnificent figure of Ranganatha
in Srirangam and his thoughts veer to one of His earlier forms – Krishna
as an infant just before the end of the Dwaapara yuga. It may be noted
that as per mythology, it is believed that before any Yuga ended, there
would be a cataclysmic event. I do not want to expand this now as it is out of
syllabus. But what I am going to tell you is the gist of the entire verse where
that expression quoted in the beginning appears.
He swallowed the
seven worlds and lay on a small fig leaf. Now, He is lying on the gigantic
snake, wearing a garland of gems, and a pearl necklace. Oh! My heart is full
now.
Can one even define or explain
that ecstatic ‘ayyo’?
On the other hand, awe-stuck
by the poetic beauty, we exclaim – Ayyo! We cannot go beyond that. But
geniuses are different. They are aesthetic in their approach and in their
expressions.
After having seen that Azhwar
and his expressions, let us see a Raaja and his expressions.
The composition is about a
couple who discover that they have fallen in love just then. Isn’t this a
normal sequence in an Indian movie? But geniuses make ordinary seem
extraordinary with their approach. And at the surface level, it looks pretty
simple. Scratch the surface and you will find many layers.
Om Namaha from Geetanjali (1989) is a composition based
on a raga called Hamsanaadam- a pentatonic raga, which once upon
a time had six swaras, but that again is out of syllabus here. It is a
very pleasing melody without a doubt, set in the 7-beat cycle, Mishram.
But, is that all?
The percussion- rhythm
pads- mimics our heartbeats. Love from the point of view of a connoisseur.
But what is amazing and astonishing is the fact that one hears these heart
beats throughout the song, a rarity for a composer known for changing the
patterns in a jiffy. Again, that is not all.
Mishram is – ta ki ta/ ta
ka dhi mi (1 2 3/ 1 2 3 4). Rather than playing all the seven beats,
the percussion plays just the first, second, fourth and fifth with
another melodic instrument playing the sixth and the seventh. Time now to
scratch the surface.
One hears the sound of the rhythm
guitar in the background and this plays all the seven beats. This is subtle
while the other one is prominent. Doesn’t this convey the philosophy of life
itself? The heart is at the superficial level but depends totally on the soul.
Heart – Rhythm pads.
Soul – Rhythm guitar.
Possible only by geniuses who
are also connoisseurs of life!
There is yet another ‘ayyo’
moment which we shall see at the end. But before that, let us look at the interludes
which too showcases the connoisseur of music.
With a haunting charm, the mandolin
unfolds the beauty of the raga. The strings glide in quietly and spread
the fragrance. The keys coo like a bird with the guitar giving
that touch of mellowness.
With musical elegance the
lines in the CharaNams, show us the unique melody of the raga,
with that mandra staayei nishadam giving that Raaja muttirai!
We shall see the CharaNam
again in a bit.
Beginning with the sound of
the bells, the second interlude sways gently and makes us sway as
well. With winsome variations, the flute shows different hues of the raga
with the strings making the glow of the raga enter our
consciousness.
And now for that moment. Just
before the 5th line, the Master keeps the panchamam (pa)
of the raga as the base Shadja (sa) and shifts it to Gambhira
naattai. It returns to Hamsanaadam in the next line.
Have you all seen the white
clouds in the sky? Have you noticed some beautiful patterns that keep changing
now and then, and also reminding us of some figures familiar to us?
Have you seen a flock of birds
fly? Have you noticed the different formations?
Have you seen the waves in the
sea? Have you noticed the undulating motif?
Have you seen different
flowers in a garden? Have you noticed the floral design?
How do these happen? Is it
that the clouds think and form patterns? Is it that the birds talk to each
other and make the formations? Is it that the waves plan and follow the motif?
Is it that the flowers draw a design on a paper and then bloom?
The answer is simple – It just
happens. And when it ‘just happens’, it is naturally beautiful. Not just
beautiful but meaningful as well.
This applies as much to poetry
and music.
That child was just around 3
when it started composing verses. Not just simple verses but ones pregnant
with meaning with layers and layers of hidden beauty.
The One who has an
ear stud; The One who rides on a Bull; The One who wears the pure white
crescent moon on His head; The One whose body is smeared with the ashes from
the crematorium; The One who stole my heart; The One who blessed Brahma- who is
seated on a lotus.
Scratch the surface and you
will find the layers.
As per Shaiva Siddhanta,
there are 5 deeds of Shiva – Creation, Protection, Destruction,
Hiding and Blessing.
Here, the first two phrases – Ear
stud and the Bull -define the Creation, the second one- Crescent
Moon- defines Protection, the third one – Ashes- defines Destruction,
the fourth one – stealing the heart – Hiding- and the last one – blessing
Brahma – Blessing.
Would that 3-year old
child -who went by the name Thirugnanasambhandar- have thought all these
before composing? ‘These’ include the description and the inner meaning? Would
he have thought that he was giving the ‘Shaiva Siddhanta’ in a capsule
form?
Not really.
At the same time, did he not
know all these?
Yes, he did. But the
difference is – the thought and the output overlapped. In other words – It just
happened.
What we are going to see now
is another case of things ‘just happening’ and falling in place. In fact, it
just not ‘falls into place’ but makes it extraordinary.
‘Unai thedum neram idhu’
from ‘Ponmekalai’(2005) is a composition based on a very classical
raga. This raga which goes by the name Naattai, is considered
a ghana raga (meaning ‘heavy’). It finds a place in Tamizh paN as
Nattapaadai. Note that Tamizh music has been in existence for
more than 2,000 years. Most importantly, the verse I quoted sometime
ago was also set in this paN (is it a coincidence or did it ‘just happen’?).
Even a causal hearing would
suggest that the sequence involves a music teacher and a student. But what is
to be noted is something else. Let us go step-by-step.
It starts with an exquisite akaaram
(Bombay Jayashri) which impacts our full sensorium. The student (no idea
about the name of this singer!) repeats the akaaram. The akaaram continues,
touches the higher-octave, and gives a sketch of the ragam in a matter
of seconds, giving way to the Pallavi. But there is magic just before
this.
Towards the end of the akaaram,
the mrudangam starts playing. Before I go further, let me mention
certain things briefly.
As is well-known, a
composition in general follows a time signature called ‘taaLa’ in the Indian
classical system. There are many taaLaas but let me confine myself
to this composition and say things that are pertinent to this.
This composition follows the 8-beat
taaLa, known as ‘Adi taaLa’. This 8 can be subdivided into
many multiples. Here, it is subdivided into 16. This 16 can be
played in different ways.
Composers who are different,
think differently, a fact known to many. Here, the Master divides that 16
as –
1/ 3/ 3/5/4.
But it does not end there. He
gives ‘kaarvai’, which can be called a gap or just ‘silence’.
Therefore, it goes like this-
-/ 1 - - / 1 - - /-
2 3 4 5/ - - - -.
If represented in the language
of Carnatic music, it is
(ta)/taangu/taangu/(ta)
te e ta a/ (ta ka dhi mi).
The ones in the brackets are
the kaaravai(s).
This is just during the akaaram.
The Master that he is,
he changes the pattern in the Pallavi:
3/3/2/3/5.
And yes, there is kaarvai
here too: 1 - -/ 1 - -/1 -/ 1 - -/ 1 - - - -.
t(aangu)/t(aangu)/dhi
-/ta - -/ ta - - - -.
The enticing bass flute
and the graceful violin combine together in the first interlude
giving a soothing experience. But what adds to the beauty is the mrudangam
which follows the first pattern.
The CharaNam follows a
normal pattern, playing all the syllables. Suddenly, the pattern shifts to the
one in the Pallavi until the swara segment.
The twin-violins move
assiduously giving the essence of the raga in the second interlude.
Needless to say, the rhythmic pattern is the first pattern.
The different structures in
the two charaNams cannot be missed. Nor the fact that it ends with the saahityam
and the mrudangam following – ta ka dhi mi/ta ka/ ta ka dhi mi/ta ka/
ta ka dhi mi.
It just happens!
If you do not believe it, ask
the One who wears the stud, the moon, sits on the bull, smears the ash on His
body and gives His blessings.
If you do not believe in Him,
it is perfectly understandable.
Just listen to the song
multiple times, and you will agree with me and say ‘Oh, yes! It just
happens!!’.
Though the question seems
tricky and even weird, a smart answer would be ‘as romantic as romance’.
Supposing the question was ‘how
romantic is devotion?’, even smart people would start blinking. Some ‘right’ people
(though invariably they are always wrong), would even take offence and start a
vituperative campaign against the person who ask such questions. It would be
still worse if the question was ‘how erotic is devotion?’.
But the fact of the matter is
that people who take exception to such questions are either ignorant or ‘prefer’
to be ignorant. Like an ostrich, they refuse to look up. After all, reality
sucks!
Leaving aside the fact that
there is no ancient temple in India without sculptures in erotic postures, it
must be understood and accepted that the Bhakti poets used romance and
eroticism as a form of devotion, a form called ‘Madhura Bhakti’. Their
poems exude with eroticism and romance. One of the classic examples is Jeyadeva’s
Geeta Govindam, in Radha and Krishna are depicted as human
lovers.
Almost all Bhakti poets
in Tamizh literature (and this predates Geeta Govindam which was
composed in the 12th century), assumed the ‘nayaki bhava’,
with the Divine being the Nayaka. I am not getting into the inner
meaning which is esoteric and therefore beyond the scope of this post. But what
I am going to do is to look at one poem as a sample.
Kulasekhara Azhwar, one of the 12 Vaishnavite saints whose
collection of verses, goes by the name ‘Naalayira Divya Prabhandam’ (4,000
sacred verses) assumes the role of a Gopika. As per mythology, Gopikas
were cowherd women who were in awe of Krishna, and danced with Krishna.
Yet again, I refrain from getting into the inner meanings. Going back to the Azhwar,
his 10 verses as one of the Gopikas, ooze with romance and
eroticism. As I said, I am quoting just one such poem:
“You gave a sidelong glance
at a woman whose dark hair was adorned with flowers, at the same time letting
your heart to another woman, told another woman that ‘I am yours’, misled
another woman by giving a false promise of meeting at a place which is
non-existent and finally embraced another woman. But you were not loyal even to
her. Oh, the one who broke the Maruda trees! Your deceit and trickery grow
along with You!”
While the humour cannot be
missed, so is the poetic beauty.
It is this aspect that makes Bhakti
literature shimmer like the full moon.
And that invariably brings us
to music. What make a composition shimmer are the tune, and the rhythm. But, is
that all? Aren’t there hidden meanings in the tune and the rhythm? Well, this
time rather than calling these ‘esoteric’ and taking an escape route, I am
going to focus on those inner meanings, aka nuances and intricacies.
If I say that Raasa
Leela VeLa from Aditya- 369 (1991) is a classic song, will I not
be stating the obvious? At times, stating the obvious is never tiring even if
it is stated ad nauseam. For starters, it is based on the Hindustani raag
Madhukauns, which is the prati madhyama counterpart of Shuddha
Dhanyasi. To make the terminology clearer, Shuddha Dhanyasi has one
variant of ‘ma’, while this one has the other variant, with the rest of
the swaras being the same. More on what these swaras are, in a
bit.
I wouldn’t call it pure Madhukans
as there are traces of the other ma and even a couple of alien swaras,
albeit sparingly. Anyway, this is beside the point.
Let me first go to the
beginning. The differently sounding guitar plays ta ka dhi mi/ ta –
first and then ta – dhi mi/ ta –. People who are regular followers of
this blog, will be able to decipher this as the micro-beats of Tisram.
For the benefit of others, let me tell you that Tisram is the 3-beat
cycle – ta ki ta – and when it is expanded, the micro-beats are generally
ta ka dhi mi ta ka, that is 6. In this particular instance, not
all the micro-beats are played and therefore the gaps are called ‘karvai’.
Going back to the rhythm, the
same pattern is repeated twice. Then there is that magic. The guitar now
sounds ta ka dhi mi, which is the 4 - beat cycle, called Chatushram.
A manual count indicates that it is sounded 15 times, which makes it 15x4,
which is equal to 60, which is divisible by both 3 and 4!
In between, during the 7th
ta ka dhi mi, the strings enter and play in higher-octave. It
is like a sudden downpour from the heavens. Yet another guitar responds
to the strings now and then. Note that there is no percussion
until now, though the taaLa pattern is as clear as the crystal.
The percussion enters and
plays ta ka dhi mi/ ta ka dhi mi/ - - - -. Wait ! Ta ka dhi mi is
four. But did I not say the composition is in tisram (3)?
Is it confusing again? While
discussing compositions like this (remember ‘esoteric’), I will not do full
justice if I leave out such aspects. So, let me explain. What is 4x3? 12?
Does it not have both ‘4’ and ‘3’? Therefore, it is 4 tisrams,
played as 3 chatushrams!
This particular pattern appears
throughout the Pallavi and the CharaNams.
Let me now take you through
the raga aspect. The prelude is a mix of Shuddha Dhanyasi
and Madhukauns, but enter the Pallavi (Vocals : SPB) and it
is pure Madhukauns. Wait for a few seconds before I unveil the structure
and along with it, something else.
Beguiling and Bewitching! This
is how I can call the sound of a very different flute in the beginning
of the first interlude. Even as it plays sans percussion, the
feeling of poignancy cannot be missed. The percussion- in the same
pattern described sometime ago- enters and along with it enters the strings
vivifying the atmosphere. The flute continues its journey for a while
and when it retires, the strings take over and now that ‘something else’
appears.
The structure of Madhukauns
is – sa ga2 ma2 pa ni2 Sa. If that ‘pa’ is taken as ‘sa’,
it becomes Chadrakauns, another raag known to evoke very deep emotions.
And yes, its structure is – sa ga2 ma1 dha2 ni3 Sa.
The technique quoted above is
called Gruha Bhedam and let me repeat – people familiar with this blog and the posts here, should be familiar with this term.
This happens when the strings
sound the second time. The flute - this time, it is the most familiar one-
coos like a bird in Chadrakauns and gives a plaintive cry when Janaki
takes over the CharaNam.
The lines in the CharaNam(s)
move with grace in that beautiful raga called Chadrakauns until
it goes back to Madhukauns just towards the end.
It is flute’s day out
in the first half of the second interlude as it bespatters different hues
of Madhukauns. Mesmerised by this, the guitar starts dancing like
the Gopika. The strings take over in the higher-octave and
in the blink of an eye, shifts to Chandrakauns. Finally, the keys
sound ta ka dhi mi/ta ka dhi mi/ta ka dhi mi twice in Chandrakauns.
Isn’t this musical leela? Kulasekhara
Azhwar will vouch for this/, wherever he is now!
It is rather tough to
determine if it is natural or if is it acquired over a period of time. There
are some born geniuses. There are also people who by virtue of their sheer hard
work and dedication, become experts. We see their genius in their works much
later.
In some cases, there is a
divine intervention and all of a sudden, a very normal person becomes a genius.
This is what happened in the case of KaaLidasa, who was an
illiterate and with the blessings of KaaLi, became a poet composing some
immortal works in Sanskrit. How far the story of him being a dumb is
true, nobody knows.
There is also the story of AruNagirinthar,
who after leading a nauseas life attempted to take his life, and just at that
moment, was blessed by Muruga. He went on to compose many verses (‘many’
is an understatement) and created a niche for himself in Tamizh
literature (and in music as far as the taaLas are concerned).
While KaaLidasa is
believed to have lived around the 4th and the 5th
century, AruNagirinthar lived in the 14th century. But
more recently too, there have been some geniuses in whose life the Divine played
an indirect role. A person who was born Muthiah, who had little formal
education and who was an atheist because of the influence of an ideology, read
the works of AaNdaaL one night, became KaNNadasan and changed the
paradigm of tamizh film songs.
Then there was somebody by
name Rangarajan who went to Madras with the dream of becoming a
lyricist, faced rejection and dejection which led him to the brink of life.
With thoughts of ending his life lingering in his mind, a song came floating in
the air, and this turned around his life. This gentleman who is better known by
the name Vaali, went on to pen many songs, songs that still float in the
air if one happens to tune in to the Radio/TV or even the other music
related applications in the digital gadgets.
Guess whose song changed his
life?
Yes, it was one of the songs
of KaNNadasan.
Apart from film songs, Vaali
( like KaNNadasan) also authored some books, that include ‘PaaNdavar
Bhoomi’ (Mahabharata) and ‘Avataara Purushan’ (RamayaNa)
in the Pudukkavitai format.
Needless to say, Vaali
was inspired by KaNNadasan who in turn was inspired by AaNdaaL.
Let me just produce a couple
of lines written by KaNNadasan first and Vaali next, and you will
know the reason after a while.
KaNNadasan once wrote – роЙрог்роЯெрой்ро▒ு роЪொро▓்ро╡родுрои்родрой்
роХрог்рогро▓்ро▓ро╡ா/ роЗро▓்ро▓ைропெрой்ро▒ு роЪொро▓்ро╡родுрои்родрой் роЗроЯைропро▓்ро▓ро╡ா.
Loosely translated (in fact,
it is next to impossible to translate this), it would mean -Your eyes make
one believe that ‘it is there’, while your waist makes on feel that ‘it
is not there’. Going a little deep, one can interpret this as ‘huge eyes’
and ‘slim waist’. Well, there is more to it than meets the eye!
Generally, a sculptor draws a sketch
of the sculpture he plans to sculp. When he goes to the eyes, he puts tick
marks on both sides and when he goes to the waist, he puts cross marks. So, a ‘Yes’
for ‘eyes’ and a ‘No’ for the waist!
Now you can see the meaning of
genius.
Vaali, the prot├йg├й , takes a different take. While
describing the beauty of Kunti in PaaNdavar Bhoomi, he says the
waist is like the Divine. Why? Don’t some people believe the existence
of God, and don’t some deny the same? So, her waist is ‘there’ and ‘not
there’!
Meaning of genius yet again?
Let us look at that verse:
роироЯைроХ்роХு роЙро╡рооை – роиродி;
роЪроЯைроХ்роХு роЙро╡рооை – роЪாро░ை;
родுроЯைроХ்роХு роЙро╡рооை – родூрог்;
роЗроЯைроХ்роХு роЙро╡рооை – роЗро▒ை!
роПройெройிро▓் ..
роЗродைрок் рокро▒்ро▒ிрод்родாрой்
‘роЗро▓родு’ ‘роЙро│родு’
роОрой-
роЗро░ைроХிро▒родு роЙро▓роХு!
Gait like a river/ Hair like a
snake/Thighs like a pillar/Waist like the Divine.
I spoke about the genius of
some masters. How can I leave out the genius who was born in a village in a
remote corner, and rose to not just compose tunes that sounded fresh and
different then (and now and forever), but also brought in a totally different
perspective to the orchestration and the background score.
The song we are going to see
today is no doubt a classic composition in terms of the melody, but I am going
to focus more on the TaaLa part. Isn’t Laya Raaja, my favourite?
KaaLidasan KaNNadasan
Kavitai Nee from Soorkkottai
Singakkutti (1983) is set in Mishram (7/8).
It starts with the akaaram
and for two cycles, goes without the backing of the percussion. The percussion
joins at the third cycle and plays ta ki ta/ ta ka dhi mi (1 2 3/ 1 2 3 4)
with precision. In the next cycle, it is ta ki ta when the male sings
and ta ka dhi mi when the female chorus sings. After 2 cycles, it
is ta ki ta/ ta ka dhi mi in the male akaaram followed by the
female chorus for the entire cycle, while the male continues the akaaram
even during the chorus segment. After 2 cycles, the instruments take
over.
The dazzling strings
play ta ki ta/ ta ka dhi mi/ ta ka dhi mi. Is it not 10 then? Not
really. The first ta ki ta is played in the normal speed while the two ta
ka dhi mi-s are played in the faster mode. So here, 8 = 4.
After two cycles, the violins
play ta ka dhi mi/ta ka/ ta ka dhi mi/ta ka dhi mi.
What is this? Should it not be
just 7 (ta ki ta/ ta ka dhi mi)? And yet again, arithmetic plays a role.
7 is further broken into 14 and is played in the faster mode. These
14 beats are the micro-beats.
This goes on for 3
cycles until the ebullient violins decide to give way to the sedate santoor
for one cycle with the latter playing just ta ki ta/ta ka dhi mi in the
normal speed. The violins join in and as if influenced by the santoor,
plays the mishram with sobriety along with the santoor.
I am sure it is understood
that the percussion keeps playing all the seven beats of mishram
in the background throughout and that I have focussed on the melodic
instruments playing the beats – not common in others’ compositions, while not
uncommon in many of his compositions.
The lines in the Pallavi (vocals- Jayachandran and Suseela) shimmer
with beauty. For academic interest, the composition is loosely based on Abheri,
with a dash of alien notes creeping in later. There are 3 sets of
percussion and all the 3 play ta - -/ ta – dhi -. The ‘-‘ are
gaps where the percussion keeps quiet and some of you familiar with my
posts here know that this is called kaarvai.
The beginning of the first
interlude glistens with the sound of the santoor, which plays ‘ta
ka dhi mi/ ta ka/ ta ka dhi mi/ta ka dhi mi’ followed by the ineluctable flute
which plays the same but in its own way.
After two cycles, the violins
play ‘ta ka dhi mi/ ta ka’ with the santoor completing ‘ta ka dhi
mi/ ta ka dhi mi’ exquisitely. The doughty violins are in full swing
then and continue to play the same pattern for 3 cycles. Just towards
the end of the third cycle, the flute joins in and plays along. Note
that the percussion takes a break during the first cycle, adding that
effect of silence.
The special effect continues
in a different way when the violins play ta ka dhi mi/ ta ka/ ta ka
dhi mi and stop, giving space to the flute which plays just two
syllables and pauses. The percussion keeps quiet yet again when the flute
plays.
The violins then
continue with the santoor pitching in. The chorus continues ta ki ta/
ta ka dhi mi in akaaram with the backing of the bass guitar.
Finally, the violins play ta ki ta/ ta ka with the santoor
playing ta ka dhi mi in faster mode, which in effect is 2 and not
4.
The lines in the CharaNam
are graceful with alien notes peeping in rather liberally. In the first half,
the tabla plays mishram giving kaarvai now and then while
in the second half, the mrudangam plays all the 7 beats.
Ta - dhi mi /ta ka/
ta – dhi mi /ta – dhi mi says the acoustic
guitar twice, appearing out of the blue, along with the rhythm guitar.
The violins play mishram in higher-octave with kaarvai (
ta – ta / ta – dhi mi) twice.
It takes a folksy turn with
the male voice which appeared in the prelude humming tantaane ta
ne in mishram leaving gaps for a cycle now and then and the
female chorus joining in in the second half. The flute follows and plays
ta ka dhi mi / ta ka/ ta ka dhi mi/ta ka dhi mi twice with the backing
of bass guitar. Finally, the enticing santoor plays ta ki ta in
the normal speed with the ebullient violins playing ta ka dhi mi/ ta
ka dhi mi in the faster mode.
These are just some of the
statements about Time. Do you see a paradox between the first three and the last
three? It typifies Time. After all, Time itself is a paradox.
Rather than analysing this and
questioning this, let us move on and focus on the topic. For, Time never waits
for anyone!
Here is a lady who has not
heard from her man for quite a while. Rather than call Time on her Love, she
waits. Her friend spots the pallor and is worried. But the lady is unperturbed.
She says, “Do not worry about
my pallor. It is surely not because of him, that man from that country where
peacocks squawk even as they sway their long plumes, on the banks of the forest
river which swells because of the heavy rains”.
While the fact that she compares
herself to the happily dancing peacocks cannot be missed, what should not be
missed is her firm conviction – Whatever happens, my love for him will be the
same!
Whether it is the 2500-year-old
KuRunthogai or a 40-year-old musical piece, certain things remain
the same.
Take this composition Kaalam
Maaralaam from Vaazhkkai (1984). Does it not sound as fresh as a
daisy after so many years and does it not make us yearn for more?
Is the reason the melody or is
there something else as well? Well, it could be both.
Sounding as soft as possible,
the guitar plays ‘ta ka dhi mi’ four times and one clearly hears a
few swaras of Hamsadhwani. Just as the fourth ‘ta ka dhi mi’
starts, SPB enters and sings the akaaram. After one cycle, we see
the entry of VaNi Jayaram, who sings the akaaram, but a melody different
from that of SPB’s. Both move together and it is a counter-point
in Hamsadwani. The lilting akaarams keep going around us in two
concentric circles.
After a while, SPB just
hums in Hamsadhwani and VaNi Jayaram responds with the same
humming. What is sandwiched in between is that sound of the veeNa,
subtle and nuanced! It sounds again after the humming of VaNi Jayaram,
and then we are in for a surprise!
Did I say ‘surprise’? Well, can
anything be a surprise if one knows this composer well?
The electric guitar plays
in Hamsadhwani, but don’t we hear an alien note?
Hamsadhwani has sa ri2 ga3 pa ni3, both in ascending and
descending, but there is a clear sound of the dhaivatam (dha1) too. Raga
texts define this scale/raga as ‘TaraLam’, derived from the 27th
meLa, Sarasangi. Has any other composer used it? I am not sure. But this
composer had used it before. Keep thinking about that song, which some people
still think is based on Latangi.
In a way, TaraLam
sounds like Latangi but the absence of the swara ‘ma’, gives it a
uniqueness. The fact that the dhaivatam gives it a poignant flavour
cannot be denied.
What cannot be denied is also
the fact that there is a kind of freshness in this raga/scale.
The prelude ends with
the guitar playing ‘ta ka dhi mi’ four times again in Hamsadhwani,
making it a circle.
Isn’t life itself a circle?
SPB starts the Pallavi. The Master of varieties,
whose other name is ILaiyaraaja, gives rest to the percussion and
makes rhythm guitar the backing instrument when the first line is
rendered the first time. And he also starts the composition with the descending
notes (Sa ni pa ga) and then goes to the ascending notes (sa ri ga pa).
If the mandra staayi (lower- octave notes) in the beginning of the next
two lines, is not a surprise, the last line (after which the Pallavi starts
again) is not a surprise at all. It goes ri ga pa ni (ini varum)
and then Sa ni ni pa ga- ascending and descending.
Circle of life again!
Note that the entire Pallavi
is in pure Hamsadhwani.
So is the first half of the first
interlude. The strings sound ta ka dhi mi in mid-octave Hamsadhwani
thrice with a new set of strings joining in during the third ta ka
dhi mi and sounding the same in higher-octave. The last part is
sounded by the keys. Vivifying the atmosphere, a set of different keys
moves with agility and the veeNa responds in its own style. The electric
guitar enters now and brings in the dhaivatam, transforming Hamsadhwani
to TaraLam.
Gracefully transiting to the western
classical style, the strings play in the higher-octave
intercepted now and then by a couple of instruments that play different sets of
notes (mainly descending). But it is the flute that steals the show by
showing a sudden flash of light, towards the end, aided by the stringed
instrument.
Don’t we see such sudden
flashes of light in our life as well?
TaraLam is in full flow in the first half of the CharaNams
in which the tabla sounds just the first and the third syllables (ta, dhi)
with intensity and with a very subtle percussion sounding just the first
syllable in the next half. It goes thus – ta – dhi - / ta - - -.
Hamsadhwani returns in the second half and a close observation
suggests that the lines are the same as that of the second and third lines of
the Pallavi, except that these are in the next octave.
Laya Raaja does it again in the second interlude. The Pallavi
is sung again first by Vani Jayaram and then by SPB. When he finishes
‘MaaRuma’, the taLa cycle is on the third beat. The bass
strings take over and play ‘ta ki ta’ for each beat and this happens
seven times. The eighth time is the samam and it plays just ‘ta ki ta’
and moves away. Note that 3x8 = 24, which is divisible both by 3
and 4.
With finesse the flute
goes on, interjected now and then by the electric guitar. The banter
between the two is tantalisingly beautiful. The strings take over and like
a clear stream, move on..
Time rolls on.
Time stands still.
Paradox? There lies the beauty
of Life!
P.S. This post is written on the occasion of the 11th anniversary of the Group, 'ILaiyaraaja - The Master' on Facebook.